EOG Resources is one of America’s premier independent oil and gas companies, known especially for its prowess in shale drilling. To understand EOG’s position in the energy industry, it’s essential to examine the major competitors vying for market share across oil, natural gas, and even emerging low-carbon initiatives. These competitors range from U.S. shale-focused operators to global oil & gas majors. Each brings unique strengths, expansive market presence, and often overlaps directly with EOG’s operations in key basins. Below, we analyze ten of EOG’s top competitors – their strengths, where they compete with EOG, and recent developments including mergers, acquisitions, and sustainability strategies.
Top Competitors of EOG Resources
1. ExxonMobil
Website – https://corporate.exxonmobil.com/
ExxonMobil is one of the world’s largest integrated oil and gas companies, and it has become an even more formidable rival to EOG in recent years.
Exxon’s sheer scale and financial muscle are unmatched – it produces energy globally and has downstream and chemical businesses that give it an integrated edge (beyond EOG’s upstream focus). Critically, ExxonMobil holds a massive position in the Permian Basin (West Texas/New Mexico), a shale region where EOG also operates. In 2023, Exxon made a blockbuster move by acquiring Pioneer Natural Resources – a leading Permian shale producer – in a $59.5 billion deal. This merger created a U.S. shale-drilling behemoth, doubling Exxon’s Permian output to about 1.3 million barrels per day and giving it 16 billion barrels of oil-equivalent resources in the Permian. The acquisition signals Exxon’s belief that oil demand will remain resilient for decades, and it dramatically increases competition for EOG in Permian shale acreage and production.
ExxonMobil’s recent strategy has been to double down on fossil fuels while also investing in carbon capture technology to reduce emissions. In 2023, alongside the Pioneer deal, Exxon bought Denbury Inc. – a company specializing in CO₂ pipelines and carbon capture – for about $4.9 billion. Through Denbury, Exxon gained infrastructure to sequester CO₂ and conduct enhanced oil recovery, aligning with its plan to leverage carbon capture and storage (CCS) to lower the carbon footprint of oil production.
Exxon’s CEO Darren Woods has emphasized that expanding oil production can go hand-in-hand with developing carbon reduction technologies. The company has pledged to reach net-zero operational (Scope 1 & 2) emissions in the Permian Basin by 2030, and industry reports note Exxon’s “bullish” stance on fossil fuels is tempered by these CCS investments aimed at prolonging the viability of oil and gas.
In short, ExxonMobil’s vast resources and recent consolidation of shale assets make it a powerful competitor to EOG, particularly in U.S. shale plays, even as Exxon also invests in decarbonization measures to address climate pressures.
2. Chevron
Website – https://www.chevron.com/
Chevron is another supermajor that competes with EOG on multiple fronts.
Chevron has a global upstream portfolio and significant downstream operations, but it’s also heavily involved in U.S. shale. In the Permian Basin, Chevron has been ramping up production and was producing well over 700,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day there by 2023. It further cemented its presence in shale through acquisitions: in mid-2023, Chevron acquired PDC Energy (a shale operator in Colorado’s DJ Basin and the Permian) and later struck a $53 billion deal to acquire Hess Corporation. The Hess acquisition, announced October 2023, is transformative – it not only gives Chevron a major foothold in the Bakken Shale (North Dakota, where Hess and EOG have both operated), but also a 30% stake in Hess’s prized Guyana offshore oil block. That Guyana asset contains over 11 billion barrels oil-equivalent and is one of the fastest-growing, low-cost oil sources globally. By absorbing Hess, Chevron boosts its daily output by an estimated 465,000 barrels of oil equivalent and shores up its long-term reserves. The deal underscores Chevron’s strategy of using mergers to secure high-margin resources – directly impacting EOG by adding another major competitor in U.S. shale fields like the Bakken and by increasing Chevron’s overall market strength.
Chevron has balanced its growth in oil with notable investments in lower-carbon initiatives, aiming to stay competitive in a decarbonizing world. The company has committed $1.5 billion of its 2025 capital budget to lower-carbon projects, including large investments in hydrogen, carbon capture, and renewable fuels. For example, Chevron is building a $5 billion “blue” hydrogen and ammonia plant in Texas (Project Labrador in Port Arthur) that will use carbon capture to produce low-carbon hydrogen. It’s also developing lithium extraction in Arkansas’s Smackover formation to tap into minerals needed for batteries. Moreover, Chevron brought forward its goal to eliminate routine flaring and is targeting a reduction in upstream carbon intensity to 71 g CO₂/MJ by 2028, leveraging technologies and the high-growth Guyana assets to fund these efforts. The Hess acquisition also feeds into this strategy – Chevron noted that the high-output Guyana oil will generate cash to invest in both traditional production and carbon reduction measures.
In summary, Chevron stands as a formidable EOG competitor with expanding U.S. shale operations (now spanning Permian, Bakken, DJ Basin and more) and a clear plan to remain a leader through both scale and a pivot to cleaner energy solutions.
3. BP (British Petroleum) 
Website – https://www.bp.com/
BP is a global oil & gas major that, while headquartered in Europe, competes with EOG in North America through its U.S. onshore division and globally via its influence on energy markets.
Historically known as “Beyond Petroleum” for its early pivot to alternative energy, BP has substantial conventional oil and gas production worldwide and a significant trading operation. In the U.S., BP gained a foothold in shale by acquiring BHP’s American shale assets in 2018 – giving it positions in the Eagle Ford Shale (South Texas), Permian Basin, and Haynesville Shale (gas in Louisiana). These assets put BP in direct competition with EOG in areas like Eagle Ford and Permian. BP’s scale is a major strength: it produces roughly 2.2–2.3 million barrels of oil equivalent per day and operates across the globe (from the Gulf of Mexico to the North Sea to Middle East gas fields). This diversification means BP can navigate market swings, but it also competes with independent producers by bringing integrated capabilities (like its own refining/marketing outlets and huge capital resources) to shale development.
In 2023–2024, BP has been recalibrating its strategy in a notable way. After spending much of the past decade investing in renewable energy and setting aggressive climate targets, BP announced in early 2023 that the global energy transition was unfolding slower than anticipated – and it decided to scale back some of its renewable ambitions in favor of oil and gas growth. Under new leadership, BP is boosting annual oil and gas capital spending to $10 billion and cutting its planned renewables spending by about $5 billion per year. It also revised its production targets: instead of reducing oil and gas output 40% by 2030 (as once pledged), BP softened the goal to a 25% cut (from 2019 levels) and dropped its absolute Scope 3 emissions reduction target for 2030.
Now, BP focuses on reducing carbon intensity of its products by 5–10% by 2030, rather than cutting total volumes. This strategic pivot means BP intends to keep substantial hydrocarbon output (good for competing in oil markets and shale plays) while still pursuing lower-carbon projects more selectively. Importantly, BP hasn’t abandoned the energy transition: it remains a leading investor in offshore wind, solar (via Lightsource BP), electric vehicle charging, and biofuels. For instance, BP acquired Archaea Energy (a renewable natural gas firm) in 2022 and continues to expand its EV charging network. It also has a net-zero 2050 ambition covering operations and some product emissions.
For EOG, BP represents a competitor with global clout that is refocusing on the core oil and gas business – including shale drilling in basins like Eagle Ford – even as it maintains a long-term narrative around sustainability and low-carbon innovation.
4. ConocoPhillips
Website – https://www.conocophillips.com/
ConocoPhillips is often considered the world’s largest pure-play independent exploration and production company, and it directly overlaps with EOG in several U.S. shale basins.
ConocoPhillips has a diversified upstream portfolio spanning the Permian Basin, Eagle Ford Shale, Bakken (Williston Basin), Alaska North Slope, and international assets (LNG projects in Qatar and Australia, oil sands in Canada, etc.). In recent years ConocoPhillips aggressively expanded its shale footprint: it acquired Concho Resources in 2021 and Shell’s Permian assets later that year, instantly making Conoco one of the top Permian producers. ConocoPhillips also has a legacy position in the Eagle Ford (where it has been a leading producer since the shale boom began), directly competing with EOG which is a fellow pioneer in that play. This company’s strengths include technical expertise, scale of production (~1.7 million boe/d in 2023 across its assets), and financial discipline. Its size and focus on shale and other low-cost resources give it an edge in efficiency and the ability to generate cash even during commodity swings. Notably, ConocoPhillips has also secured long-term international projects (e.g. it’s a partner in the giant Qatar LNG expansion), which diversify its revenue beyond the basins where it competes with EOG.
ConocoPhillips has been active on both the M&A and climate strategy fronts. In 2023, it exercised its preemption right to purchase the remaining 50% stake in Surmont, a Canadian oil sands project, for about $3 billion. This move, closing in late 2023, gave Conoco full control of a long-life resource, albeit a higher-carbon one – signaling its commitment to boosting reserves and cash flow (the Surmont deal is expected to add ~$600 million in annual free cash flow). On the sustainability side, ConocoPhillips has articulated a “Triple Mandate” strategy: meet energy demand, deliver returns, and achieve net-zero operational emissions by 2050. The company set targets to cut Scope 1 and 2 GHG intensity 50% by 2030 (from a 2017 baseline) and to essentially eliminate routine flaring by 2025. ConocoPhillips reported that it had already reduced its methane emissions intensity significantly and was on track for these goals. In fact, by the end of 2023 Conoco had achieved near-zero routine flaring in its operations and reached its 2025 GHG intensity reduction goal (50% cut) two years early. The company also invests in promising low-carbon technologies: it has partnered on a major U.S. Gulf Coast hydrogen and ammonia project (with JERA and Uniper) and funded a direct air capture startup (Avnos) to explore carbon removal.
These efforts – combined with its core shale developments in Permian and Eagle Ford – mean ConocoPhillips is both a formidable competitor in drilling efficiency and cost (often going head-to-head with EOG on well performance in Texas) and a peer in adopting decarbonization measures like methane monitoring and carbon capture pilots.
5. Pioneer Natural Resources
Website – https://www.pxd.com/
Pioneer Natural Resources has been one of the quintessential U.S. shale oil companies and a direct rival of EOG, especially in Texas.
Pioneer’s focus has been almost exclusively on the Permian Basin (Midland Basin) in West Texas, where it amassed extensive acreage. It became the largest oil producer in the Midland Basin and is known for its technical innovation in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling. Pioneer’s strengths included a low cost of supply (thanks to large contiguous acreage blocks, in-house fracking sand sourcing, and efficient drilling) and a strategy of returning cash to shareholders, which set the pace in the shale patch. EOG and Pioneer have often been compared for their high-quality shale portfolios and operational excellence. In fact, both were early movers in U.S. unconventional oil – EOG in the Eagle Ford and Bakken, and Pioneer in the Permian – and both built reputations for strong well productivity.
A major development for Pioneer (and the industry) came in late 2023: ExxonMobil agreed to acquire Pioneer in a mega-merger. Once that deal closed (in early 2024), Pioneer became part of Exxon’s empire, but it’s worth noting what Pioneer achieved on its own. On the sustainability front, Pioneer has been an industry leader in reducing emissions and improving environmental performance in shale operations. By 2022, Pioneer had cut its greenhouse gas emissions intensity by 22% and methane intensity by 64% compared to 2019. It also virtually eliminated routine flaring ahead of schedule – reaching only 0.54% flaring intensity in 2022 and committing to end routine flaring completely by 2025. Pioneer was one of the first U.S. operators to sign onto the Oil & Gas Methane Partnership (OGMP 2.0) for rigorous methane leak detection, setting a methane intensity target of 0.2% by 2025. Impressively, Pioneer invested in renewable energy to power its field operations: in 2023 it began constructing a 140 MW wind farm (51 turbines) on its own West Texas acreage, in partnership with NextEra Energy, to directly supply electricity to its Permian facilities. This large-scale renewables project – expected online in 2024 – helps reduce Pioneer’s reliance on carbon-intensive grid power or diesel generators. All these initiatives show how a pure-shale operator can pursue decarbonization.
For EOG, Pioneer’s legacy (now under Exxon) means stiffer competition in Permian drilling prowess, but also a model of integrating sustainability into shale development (something EOG itself practices, albeit with its own techniques). The Exxon-Pioneer combination specifically creates a formidable competitor with both shale expertise and deep financial resources, likely raising the bar for efficiency in Permian operations.
6. Devon Energy
Website – https://www.devonenergy.com/
Devon Energy is another leading U.S. independent that frequently competes with EOG in shale oil and gas plays. Based in Oklahoma City, Devon operates across several basins – notably the Delaware Basin (Permian’s western sub-basin), the Anadarko Basin in Oklahoma, the Eagle Ford Shale, the Williston Basin (Bakken), and the Powder River Basin. Strengths & Market Presence: Devon became an early innovator in shale gas (it was a pioneer in the Barnett Shale in the 2000s) and later shifted strongly into oil-rich shales. A transformative event was its 2021 merger with WPX Energy, which boosted Devon’s Delaware Basin assets. In 2022, Devon acquired Validus Energy’s Eagle Ford assets and RimRock’s Bakken assets, thereby expanding its footprint in South Texas and North Dakota – areas where EOG also has major operations. These acquisitions mean Devon now directly competes with EOG in Eagle Ford (Devon re-entered that play and became a significant producer there) and in the Williston Basin. Devon’s strengths include a focus on shareholder returns (they were one of the first to introduce a fixed-plus-variable dividend model for oil producers) and an operational focus on cost control and technology. They have a balanced oil-gas portfolio, with significant crude oil output in the Permian and Bakken and natural gas production in the Anadarko (Oklahoma) and Haynesville (via legacy assets).
Devon has set clear environmental performance targets and has been making measurable progress. The company aims for net-zero GHG emissions (Scope 1 & 2) by 2050 and established interim goals to cut emissions intensity by 50% and methane intensity by 65% by 2030 (from 2019 levels). By the end of 2023, Devon had already reduced its Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions by 16% and methane emissions by 52% compared to 2019. It also slashed flaring dramatically – achieving an 83% reduction in flared gas volumes since 2019. Devon’s flaring intensity dropped to just 0.4% of gas produced in 2023, and it set a goal to eliminate routine flaring by 2030. The company received OGMP 2.0 Gold Standard certification for its methane reporting, underscoring its commitment to transparent emissions management. In terms of operations, Devon’s 2023 focus was on integrating acquired assets and maintaining capital discipline amid volatile oil prices. It did not engage in mega-mergers but has hinted at opportunistic bolt-ons if they add value.
For EOG, Devon represents a competitive force across multiple basins – the two companies often go head-to-head on metrics like well productivity in the Delaware Basin or cost per barrel in Eagle Ford. Devon’s improvements in environmental performance also mirror an industry-wide push (including by EOG) to address methane leaks and flaring, meaning competition now extends to the realm of ESG credentials as well.
7. Occidental Petroleum (Oxy)
Website – https://www.oxy.com/
Occidental Petroleum is a large independent (sometimes classed among “super-independents”) that competes with EOG especially in the Permian Basin and in the race to innovate lower-carbon oil production.
Oxy’s defining asset is its vast Permian Basin position – it became the #1 producer in the Permian after acquiring Anadarko Petroleum in 2019. That deal gave Oxy extensive shale acreage in the Permian’s Delaware Basin (overlapping New Mexico areas where EOG also operates) and in the Denver-Julesburg (DJ) Basin in Colorado, as well as conventional assets. Oxy also has significant operations in the Middle East and a chemicals business, but in terms of competition with EOG, the Permian shale operations are key. Oxy has excelled in techniques like CO₂-enhanced oil recovery (EOR) in West Texas for decades. This expertise dovetails with a new strength: carbon capture and sequestration. Oxy’s vision is to transform into a carbon management company while continuing to produce oil – a strategy that differentiates it from most peers.
In 2023, Occidental made headlines by investing heavily in direct air capture (DAC) technology. It agreed to acquire Carbon Engineering Ltd., a leading DAC tech developer, for $1.1 billion. This bold move will help Oxy build approximately 100 DAC plants in coming decades to suck CO₂ from the atmosphere, which can then be stored underground or used (for example, injected into oil reservoirs to boost output while storing CO₂). Oxy’s first large DAC facility in Texas (nicknamed “Stratos” in the Permian) received U.S. government support and is under construction, aiming to pull 500,000 tons of CO₂ from air annually once operational. By leveraging federal tax credits for carbon removal, Oxy sees a profitable new business that also aids its pledge to reach net-zero emissions for not only Scope 1 and 2 but also Scope 3 (use of products) by 2050 – an ambitious goal among oil producers. In addition to Carbon Engineering, Oxy in 2023 also acquired smaller carbon capture firms (e.g., it bought a startup called Holocene) to round out its carbon tech portfolio.
Meanwhile, Oxy continues to expand traditional operations in a climate-conscious way. It has been reducing routine flaring and reported capturing over 95% of produced gas in its shale operations. Its oil production growth is moderate due to debt constraints post-Anadarko acquisition, but by 2022–2024 Oxy paid down debt substantially (aided by Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway investing heavily in OXY shares). For EOG, Occidental is a strong competitor in Permian drilling – both vie for top-tier well results in the Delaware Basin. But Oxy’s differentiator is its bet on carbon management: if Oxy can scale up carbon capture hubs in Texas and sell “net-zero oil” (oil produced with CO₂ injected so that the lifecycle emissions are offset), it could change the competitive landscape. Oxy’s strategy has positioned it as a leader among oil companies in the CCUS (carbon capture, utilization, and storage) arena.
Thus, Occidental challenges EOG not just in pumping hydrocarbons, but also in the narrative of producing oil more sustainably – a space EOG may need to watch as investors and regulators put more value on low-carbon credentials.
8. Marathon Oil
Website – https://www.marathonoil.com/
Marathon Oil Corporation is a Houston-based independent E&P (not to be confused with Marathon Petroleum, the downstream refiner) that competes with EOG Resources primarily in two shale oil basins: the Eagle Ford and the Bakken.
Marathon Oil’s core assets are spread across four areas – the Eagle Ford in South Texas, the Bakken in North Dakota, the Oklahoma STACK/SCOOP plays, and an international segment in Equatorial Guinea (natural gas and LNG). The Eagle Ford Shale is a major overlap with EOG: Marathon is one of the largest operators in the play, especially after a significant acquisition in late 2022. Marathon purchased the Eagle Ford assets of Ensign Natural Resources for $3 billion, adding 130,000 net acres and boosting its production there by about 67,000 boe/d. This has made Marathon a direct rival to EOG in the Eagle Ford, where EOG is historically the leading producer. In the Bakken, Marathon has been active for over a decade and produces oil and gas from the Williston Basin (similarly, EOG has substantial Bakken operations). Marathon’s strengths include a streamlined portfolio (it divested higher-cost assets over the years to focus on these core four areas) and a strong balance sheet, which allows it to invest steadily and return capital to shareholders. It often emphasizes capital efficiency – like drilling high-impact wells in core acreage and refraining from growth-for-growth’s-sake.
Marathon Oil has been pursuing aggressive environmental targets as well. By 2023, the company announced it achieved its 2025 greenhouse gas intensity reduction goal (50% cut) two years ahead of schedule. It improved gas capture in its operations to 99.5%, meaning it flares or vents very little of the gas it produces, a crucial factor in shale where associated gas comes with oil. Marathon committed to zero routine flaring by 2025, five years earlier than the World Bank’s 2030 goal, and is well on its way to that. The company’s ESG reports highlight that it reached those emissions and flaring targets through steps like upgrading equipment, investing in gas gathering infrastructure, and closely monitoring methane leaks. On the business side, after the Ensign Eagle Ford acquisition, Marathon spent 2023 digesting the new assets and using the increased cash flow for shareholder returns (it has been buying back shares and increasing dividends). It’s also worth noting Marathon’s Equatorial Guinea operations – while not directly competing with EOG, they give Marathon a long-lived gas stream and exposure to global LNG, which diversifies its revenue.
For EOG, Marathon Oil represents a nimble competitor in some of the same neighborhoods – for instance, both were among the first to restart drilling and completions in the Eagle Ford when oil prices recovered, and both vie for efficiencies in that mature shale play. Marathon’s early achievement of emission goals exemplifies how even mid-size operators are prioritizing sustainability alongside growth, a trend EOG has mirrored with its own emission cuts.
9. Chesapeake Energy (Now named Expand Energy)
Website – https://www.expandenergy.com/
Expand Energy, once known as the poster child of the U.S. shale gas boom (and bust), has re-emerged from restructuring as a focused natural gas producer. While Expand is now less directly competitive with EOG in oil (having divested most oil-rich assets), it is a key competitor in the natural gas segment, and its strategic shifts influence the shale industry at large.
Expand’s strength lies in its prime positions in big gas plays – notably the Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania and the Haynesville Shale in Louisiana/Texas. These are two of the largest gas fields in the U.S. Expand produces over 4 billion cubic feet of gas per day, making it one of the top gas producers (rivaling EQT). Historically, Expand also held oil acreage (including Eagle Ford oil wells that competed with EOG’s), but in 2023 it chose to sell its Eagle Ford assets to focus purely on gas. By early 2023, Expand had sold its south Texas oil properties to WildFire Energy and INEOS for over $2.5 billion, effectively exiting the Eagle Ford. This sharpened Expand’s focus on gas basins where EOG is not present (EOG isn’t in Marcellus or Haynesville). However, EOG does produce substantial associated gas from its oil wells and some stand-alone gas (e.g., EOG has gas operations in the Permian and in Trinidad). In the broader market, Expand Energy is a competitor in supplying U.S. natural gas to domestic and future LNG markets, which can indirectly affect EOG’s gas pricing and strategy.
Expand Energy has pivoted to branding itself as a leader in responsible, low-emission natural gas. It set an ambitious goal to reach net-zero direct GHG emissions by 2035, far sooner than most oil companies. By year-end 2023, Expand Energy had already met its interim climate targets ahead of schedule: it cut Scope 1 and 2 GHG intensity to 2.1 mtCO₂e per 1,000 boe – a 60% reduction since 2020, beating its 2025 goal. It also slashed methane emissions intensity by 80% since 2020, down to a minuscule 0.02% of gas produced. These gains put Expand Energy firmly on the path to net-zero and reflect extensive efforts to eliminate routine flaring and to fix methane leaks. Notably, Expand Energy was the first company to certify 100% of its gas production as “Responsibly Sourced Gas (RSG)” – independently verified to have low methane emissions. It recertified its entire asset base in 2023 under the MiQ and Equitable Origin standards. Expand Energy also joined the OGMP 2.0 methane partnership to further improve emissions transparency.
On the corporate front, Expand Energy announced in 2024 a major merger with Southwestern Energy, another big Appalachian gas producer, to form a combined entity (to be named “Expand Energy”) that would be the largest U.S. natural gas producer. This consolidation, expected to close by late 2024, underscores how Expand Energy is doubling down on gas scale.
For EOG, Expand Energy’s evolution is notable: rather than competing in oil, Expand Energy is now a benchmark for cleaner gas production. EOG must consider that its own gas (often a byproduct of oil drilling) will compete in markets increasingly concerned with methane leakage. In essence, Expand Energy has become both a fierce competitor in volume (flooding the market with gas which can affect prices for all, including EOG’s gas output) and a leader in ESG for gas, raising the standards that all producers will be expected to meet.
10. Hess Corporation
Website – https://www.hess.com/
Hess Corporation, until its recent acquisition by Chevron, was a notable independent oil company that intersected with EOG in certain areas.
Hess built its U.S. business around the Bakken Shale in North Dakota. Along with EOG and Continental Resources, Hess was one of the original big players in the Bakken, and it continues to produce significant volumes of light oil there. This put Hess in direct competition with EOG in terms of acreage and infrastructure in the Williston Basin. However, Hess’s crown jewel in recent years was its stake in the offshore Guyana development. Hess owned 30% of the Exxon-operated Stabroek Block in Guyana, which contains over 11 billion barrels of recoverable resources. That asset is transforming Hess (and now will transform Chevron) due to its enormous production growth (expected to reach 1.2+ million barrels per day by late 2020s with multiple FPSO vessels). Hess also had legacy assets in the Gulf of Mexico and earlier in Southeast Asia (Malaysia-Thailand), though it sold some non-core assets to focus on Bakken and Guyana. The company’s strength lay in its ability to find and develop big projects (Guyana being a prime example), and in squeezing efficiencies out of the Bakken (Hess developed significant midstream infrastructure for gas capture in North Dakota).
Hess committed to net-zero Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 2050 and set bold interim targets. It aimed to cut operated greenhouse gas and methane intensity by ~50% by 2025 (from 2017) and to achieve zero routine flaring by 2025 – notably earlier than many peers. By 2023, Hess was on track to outperform these goals, reporting significant progress toward the 50% emissions intensity reduction and already reaching a flaring intensity of around 3%, thanks to robust gas capture in the Bakken. Hess Midstream helped capture Bakken gas, supporting Hess in meeting its flaring target in 2023. Moreover, Hess made innovative climate investments: in 2022 it agreed to spend $750 million over 10 years on REDD+ carbon credits from Guyana’s forests – essentially funding forest conservation as a nature-based offset for emissions. In 2023, Hess also donated $50 million to the Salk Institute’s carbon sequestration plant research (Harnessing Plants Initiative) to foster future carbon sinks. These moves illustrate Hess’s approach of coupling its high-growth oil projects with efforts to mitigate climate impact via offsets and technology. The biggest recent development, of course, is that Chevron agreed to acquire Hess (announced Oct 2023) and as of mid-2025 was closing the deal.
For EOG, Hess’s presence as an independent meant competition in the Bakken (where Hess’s dedication to gas capture and steady drilling improved basin-wide performance). Now under Chevron, Hess’s assets – especially Bakken – will be backed by a major’s capital, potentially intensifying competition there. Globally, while EOG is not in offshore Guyana, Hess’s example shows how even independent companies can leap into mega-projects; EOG similarly has a small international footprint (e.g. Trinidad gas) and might look for opportunities, albeit not on Guyana’s scale. In sum, Hess brought a mix of disciplined shale operations and bold global ventures, and its legacy pushes competitors like EOG to match both its operational efficiency and its efforts to align growth with sustainability goals.
Conclusion
EOG Resources faces a dynamic competitive landscape that spans nimble U.S. shale specialists and powerful international majors. Companies like Pioneer, Devon, and Marathon Oil challenge EOG directly in shale basins through innovation and efficiency, while giants like ExxonMobil, Chevron, BP, and Occidental bring vast resources and evolving strategies (from consolidation plays to decarbonization investments) that influence the entire industry.
Each competitor overlaps with EOG in different segments – be it oil output in the Permian and Eagle Ford, natural gas marketing, or even emerging low-carbon initiatives like carbon capture or certified “green” gas. Notably, a common thread across these competitors is the recent emphasis on sustainability and decarbonization, whether through reducing methane leaks, ending flaring, investing in renewables, or capturing carbon. This mirrors EOG’s own initiatives and reflects a broader shift in the oil and gas sector: competition is not only about producing energy at low cost but doing so in a way that meets investor and societal expectations for environmental responsibility.
As of 2025, EOG remains one of the top performers in its peer group, but the moves by its rivals – from Exxon’s mega-mergers to Chesapeake’s gas transformation – mean EOG will continually adapt its strategy. In the end, the benefit for the industry and consumers is that competition drives improvements. EOG and its competitors are finding new ways to be more productive, more resilient to market swings, and more sustainable – ensuring that this vital industry can meet energy demand while innovating for a lower-carbon future.
Also Read: Who are Rosneft’s Top Competitors in Global Energy Industry?
Also Read: Who are the Top Competitors and Alternatives of Aramco?
Also Read: Top Chevron Competitors and Alternatives
To read more content like this, subscribe to our newsletter
