Glencore stands as a unique hybrid in the commodities world – a mining powerhouse and commodity trading giant wrapped into one. But it’s far from alone. Across the globe, other resource titans compete in mining essential metals, trading oil and minerals, and feeding the world with grain and fuel. These competitors span continents and sectors, from Anglo-Australian mining companies pulling copper and iron ore from the ground to Swiss oil traders moving millions of barrels of crude. In this article, we’ll explore more than ten of Glencore’s top global competitors, highlighting who they are, how they overlap with Glencore’s businesses, and their latest strategic moves.
Glencore’s rivals are as diverse as its operations. Mining conglomerates like BHP and Rio Tinto match Glencore’s scale in extracting copper, coal, and nickel. Commodity trading houses such as Trafigura and Vitol go head-to-head with Glencore’s marketing arm, profiting from volatile energy and metals markets. Energy majors and traders compete for oil, gas, and power market share, while agribusiness giants like Cargill and ADM challenge Glencore (historically active in grain trading) for dominance in global food supply chains. Each competitor brings its own regional strength – from China’s state-backed entrants to America’s agricultural exporters – ensuring that Glencore faces competition on all fronts.
In the following sections, we delve into each competitor’s story. We’ll see how legacy miners are pivoting to “future-facing” minerals for the green transition, how trading firms rode a wave of volatility to record profits, and how agribusinesses are bulking up via mergers to feed a growing world. Short, digestible paragraphs will highlight each company’s operations, their overlap with Glencore, recent developments like mergers or ESG initiatives, and their market position. Let’s meet the rivals in Glencore’s arena.
Top Competitors of Glencore
1) BHP
Website – https://www.bhp.com/
BHP Group is the world’s largest listed mining company and one of Glencore’s most formidable rivals in the mining sector. Headquartered in Australia and the UK, BHP has a massive global footprint extracting iron ore, copper, coal, nickel, and more. The company built its legacy on bulk commodities – it’s a top producer of iron ore and metallurgical coal – but today BHP is aggressively pivoting toward “future-facing” minerals. It has ramped up copper output to record levels (over 2 million tonnes in 2025) and is expanding in nickel and potash to supply electric vehicles and agriculture.
Competition between BHP and Glencore is intense in overlapping commodities like copper and coal. Both are among the world’s top-3 copper producers, often vying for acquisitions to boost reserves. Notably, Glencore’s attempt to merge with Rio Tinto in 2024 came after BHP’s own bold (but failed) ~$49 billion takeover bid for Anglo American– a sign of the competitive consolidation pressures in mining. In coal, BHP has largely exited thermal coal, while Glencore remains an “outlier” holding onto coal assets. This difference in strategy – BHP shedding fossil fuels (it spun off its petroleum arm in 2022 and has been reviewing coal assets) and Glencore embracing them – highlights contrasting approaches to ESG concerns and market positioning.
Recent Developments: BHP has doubled down on growth in copper and potash. It is investing heavily in the giant Jansen potash project in Canada – a move to diversify from iron ore – though that project recently saw delays and cost overruns, with first output now pushed to 2027. On the copper front, BHP is eyeing organic growth and exploring deals; it has flagged interest in U.S. opportunities and earlier made unsuccessful approaches to acquire major players (like Anglo). Having merged its oil & gas division with Woodside Energy in 2022, BHP has fully exited petroleum to focus on minerals critical for decarbonization. Financially, BHP remains a juggernaut – even as commodity prices cooled in 2023–24, it maintained strong margins and shareholder returns. With its scale, diversified portfolio, and strategic shifts, BHP continues to be a benchmark against which Glencore measures itself in the mining industry.
2) Rio Tinto
Website – https://www.riotinto.com/
Rio Tinto is another Anglo-Australian giant that competes head-to-head with Glencore in several minerals. Traditionally known for its iron ore dominance (Rio is the world’s largest iron ore producer, feeding China’s steel industry), Rio Tinto also mines aluminum, copper, diamonds, and more. In recent years, it has been transforming its portfolio towards “high-end” minerals needed for the green transition. Notably, in 2024 Rio Tinto made a splash by agreeing to buy a U.S.-based lithium company in a $6.7 billion deal, a move that will make Rio the world’s third-largest lithium producer used in EV batteries. This bold bet on lithium underscores how Rio is reinventing itself as a supplier of battery metals alongside its bulk commodities.
In areas like copper, Rio Tinto and Glencore are direct competitors. Rio has expanded its copper production with projects like Oyu Tolgoi in Mongolia and the new underground mine there, while Glencore mines copper across Africa and Latin America. Both companies recognize surging copper demand from electric vehicles and renewable energy, and they’ve raced to secure more reserves. Rio even explored combinations – Glencore approached Rio about a potential merger in late 2024 (talks that did not progress). Culturally, Rio differs by being primarily a miner (with less in-house trading expertise), whereas Glencore’s trader mindset might extract more value from Rio’s production. The two firms overlap in coal as well – though Rio has exited most coal mining, focusing on cleaner assets, while Glencore still operates coal mines.
Recent Developments: Aside from the lithium acquisition, Rio Tinto has been pursuing growth in other critical minerals. It’s investing in lithium projects (exploring options in Argentina and partnering with others in Chile) and has expanded in copper (completing its takeover of Turquoise Hill to own more of Oyu Tolgoi). Rio has also faced challenges: its proposed Jadar lithium mine in Serbia was stalled by local opposition, and the company has worked to rebuild trust after a 2020 controversy in which it destroyed a sacred indigenous site in Australia. On the ESG front, Rio’s new leadership emphasizes sustainable practices and advancing low-carbon aluminum and high-grade iron ore to help customers cut emissions. Financially, after windfall profits in 2021, Rio saw profits normalize as iron ore prices cooled, but it remains very cash-generative. With a market capitalization often above $100 billion, Rio Tinto’s scale and shifts into battery metals ensure it remains one of Glencore’s top global competitors in the resources sector.
3) Vale
Website – https://vale.com/
Vale S.A., based in Brazil, is a leading global miner that competes with Glencore in key commodities. Vale is famously the world’s largest iron ore producer (rivaled only by Rio Tinto), supplying high-grade iron ore to steelmakers worldwide. But beyond iron, Vale also produces nickel, copper, and coal, and it has been refocusing on base metals in recent years. Historically, Vale and Glencore have overlapped in nickel (Vale operates big nickel mines in Canada, Indonesia, and Brazil, while Glencore has nickel assets in Canada and New Caledonia) and in copper (though Vale’s copper output is smaller, it’s growing). Both companies were also in coal, but Vale exited its coal operations by 2021 to concentrate on core businesses.
Competition is perhaps sharpest in nickel and cobalt (EV battery materials). Vale is pushing aggressively into the electric vehicle supply chain, much like Glencore which is a major cobalt trader. In 2023, Vale struck a landmark deal: it sold a 13% stake in its base metals unit (nickel and copper assets) for $3.4 billion to outside investors including Saudi Arabia’s sovereign fund. This deal values Vale’s base metals business at $26 billion and brings in capital to boost nickel and copper output for EV markets. Vale’s CEO emphasized that with this “high-quality portfolio” it is “uniquely positioned to meet growing demand for green metals” critical to the energy transition. Similarly, Glencore has positioned itself as a key supplier of battery-grade nickel and cobalt, forging supply deals with EV makers like Tesla. Both firms, therefore, are vying to be major players in the battery metals era.
Recent Developments: Vale’s transformation is in full swing. It plans to invest $25–30 billion over the next decade in strategic minerals, aiming to nearly triple its copper production (to ~900,000 tonnes/year) and almost double nickel output (>300,000 tonnes/year). It has already secured long-term nickel supply agreements with Tesla and General Motors, underscoring its integration into EV supply chains. On the iron ore side, Vale has worked on improving safety and rebuilding its reputation after the 2019 Brumadinho tailings dam disaster. The company is also innovating with green initiatives – developing “green briquette” iron products that cut steelmaking emissions. Financially, Vale saw profits dip sharply in 2023 as iron ore prices fell (a 78% drop in Q2 profit year-on-year), prompting cost cuts. Yet Vale remains highly profitable and among the world’s most valuable mining firms. Its global presence (operating in Brazil, Canada, Indonesia, and more) and strategic pivot to battery minerals ensure Vale remains a heavyweight competitor to Glencore in the global resources industry.
4) Anglo American
Website – https://www.angloamerican.com/
Anglo American plc is a UK-headquartered mining multinational that, like Glencore, spans a broad range of commodities. Anglo produces copper, nickel, iron ore, platinum group metals (PGMs), diamonds, and coal. This diversified mix means Anglo competes with Glencore across several sectors: notably in copper (Anglo has large mines in South America), in metallurgical coal for steelmaking, and even in nickel (though Anglo’s nickel exposure is smaller). Where Anglo differs is its significant platinum and diamond businesses – it owns 85% of De Beers, making it a giant in diamonds, a segment where Glencore is not present.
Glencore and Anglo American have a history of competitive (and sometimes collaborative) dynamics. In 2023, when Canada’s Teck Resources was in play, Glencore’s hostile bid for Teck (aimed at creating a coal spin-off and merging metals) drew attention – interestingly, reports suggested Glencore had considered a combination with Anglo American as well. And in 2024, BHP’s attempted $49 billion takeover of Anglo American (ultimately rebuffed) underscored Anglo’s value and the consolidation pressures in mining. Anglo’s rich copper and diamond assets make it an attractive target, but also a strong competitor. For example, Anglo’s new Quellaveco copper mine in Peru (opened in 2022) significantly boosts its copper output, challenging Glencore’s copper leadership. In coal, Anglo spun off its thermal coal mines (forming Thungela in 2021) and only mines metallurgical coal now – a different stance from Glencore’s continued coal investments.
Recent Developments: Anglo American has been reviewing and reshaping its portfolio amid profit pressures. In 2023, its net profit plunged 94% (to just $0.3 billion from $4.5 billion in 2022) due to weaker prices and heavy writedowns. The company took a $1.6 billion impairment on De Beers (amid a diamond market slump) and a $500 million hit on a nickel project. CEO Duncan Wanblad launched a year-long strategic review of all assets – “absolutely nothing is off the table,” he said – to decide which businesses fit the future. Anglo is grappling with underperformers like its platinum and diamond units and even exploring options for a massive UK fertilizer project (polyhalite) where it logged a $1.7 billion writedown. On the positive side, Anglo’s copper production is rising (up 28% in Q1 2023 year-on-year thanks to Quellaveco), and it remains a top producer of platinum and palladium via Anglo American Platinum. Anglo is also investing in innovation – from hydrogen-powered haul trucks to digital twinning of mines – to boost efficiency and sustainability. With operations on five continents (notably South Africa, South America, and Australia), Anglo American remains a key global competitor, often vying with Glencore for the same growth opportunities in the mining world.
5) Trafigura
Website – https://www.trafigura.com/
Trafigura Group is a private commodities trading firm headquartered in Singapore (formerly based in Amsterdam/Switzerland) and is one of Glencore’s fiercest competitors in commodity trading. While Glencore straddles mining and trading, Trafigura focuses on the physical trading of commodities – notably oil and petroleum products, natural gas (including LNG), and metals. In fact, Trafigura is among the world’s top independent oil traders and also has a significant presence in base metals trading (like copper and zinc concentrates), a realm where it directly competes with Glencore’s marketing division.
The past few years have been exceptionally volatile – and lucrative – for trading houses like Trafigura. In the wake of the pandemic and Russia’s war in Ukraine, Trafigura enjoyed “exceptional returns” from dislocations in energy markets. It posted record profits, including a stunning net profit of $5.5 billion in the first half of 2023 alone, double the prior year’s period. For perspective, that was 80% of its record full-year profit in 2022 ($7 billion). Trafigura’s strength came especially from its oil, gas, and LNG trading desks, which capitalized on soaring prices and arbitrage opportunities in 2022. Rival Glencore likewise saw trading profits surge in that period, underscoring how closely matched these firms are during market swings. However, Trafigura faced a huge setback in early 2023 with a major nickel fraud scandal – it discovered that cargoes it bought (worth hundreds of millions) didn’t contain nickel at all. The company took a $590 million impairment due to this “systematic fraud”, highlighting the risks in metals trading. Despite the hit, Trafigura remained profitable and continued expanding.
Recent Developments: Trafigura has been in growth mode, but also introspection after the nickel saga. It recorded a $577 million charge in 2023 from the fraud case and pursued legal action against the culprit. Even so, Trafigura’s first-half 2023 net profit (post-scandal) remained robust at $5.5 billion, showing resilience. The firm does caution that the era of supernormal trading profits is likely to moderate as markets normalize. Indeed, by late 2023 and 2024, volatility in some markets (like natural gas) calmed, and Trafigura, like Glencore, expects trading conditions to be less extreme going forward. Strategically, Trafigura has been diversifying: it’s investing in renewable energy and metals projects, and it continues to build its logistics assets (ports, storage) worldwide to secure supply chains. It also reportedly raised its equity base significantly (to over $16 billion) to support higher trading volumes. With ~ $130 billion in revenue in recent periods, Trafigura’s scale in oil and metals trading keeps it neck-and-neck with Glencore’s trading business. The two firms often compete for the same deals – whether it’s an oil cargo from West Africa or a batch of cobalt from the DRC – making Trafigura one of Glencore’s top global competitors outside the mining sphere.
6) Vitol
Website – https://www.vitol.com/
Vitol Group is a titan in energy trading and a direct competitor to Glencore’s oil trading division. Founded in Rotterdam and now run from Geneva/London, Vitol is the world’s largest independent oil trader, moving more crude oil and refined petroleum than any other trading house. It also has a significant presence in LNG (liquefied natural gas), natural gas, and even power markets. While Glencore trades around 4–5 million barrels of oil per day, Vitol often trades well over 7 million barrels per day, leveraging its global storage and logistics network. The overlap is clear: both companies profit from arbitrage in oil flows, storage plays, and supply deals with producers and consumers worldwide.
Vitol’s financial performance in recent years has been astonishing, even eclipsing Glencore’s trading gains. In 2022, Vitol made a record net profit of $15 billion – an all-time high for any oil trader – thanks to extreme price spikes and dislocations after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. (For comparison, Glencore’s entire net income in 2022, including mining, was around $18.9 billion). The boom continued into 2023, when Vitol reportedly earned another ~$13 billion. By 2024, as markets calmed, Vitol’s profit was estimated at a still-impressive $8–8.5 billion. These figures underscore how trading volatility has filled Vitol’s coffers, allowing it to reward its partners handsomely – Vitol paid out $2.5 billion to employee-shareholders in both 2022 and 2023 as dividends/buybacks. Rival traders like Glencore and Trafigura similarly had strong results, but Vitol’s scale in oil gave it an edge during the energy crunch. Both Vitol and Glencore were beneficiaries of the reshaped global oil flows as Western sanctions on Russia forced crude and diesel into new trade routes.
Recent Developments: Vitol remains a private partnership, quietly expanding its global footprint. It has invested in energy infrastructure (refineries, terminals, upstream assets) to integrate its trading. The company is also navigating the energy transition: as an oil-focused firm, it’s diversifying into natural gas, power, and even renewables trading. Vitol has set up a carbon trading desk and is financing some renewable projects, acknowledging a changing landscape. However, oil and gas remain its bread and butter for now. In 2023, Vitol’s revenues soared to $400+ billion (even with lower prices, volume growth kept revenue high). One notable angle is Vitol’s approach to compliance – like Glencore and others, Vitol has faced investigations (e.g., in the past for bribery in Latin America) and has paid fines, though it has tried to strengthen compliance since. As the king of oil trading, Vitol’s market moves often set the tone: when Vitol sees a supply crunch or opportunity, Glencore usually sees the same, putting them in direct rivalry on trading deals. With robust profits and a strong balance sheet (nearly $60 billion in equity accumulated over recent years), Vitol is well-equipped to remain a top competitor, especially in energy markets that Glencore also serves.
7) Cargill
Website – https://www.cargill.com/
Cargill, Inc. is a U.S.-based agribusiness giant and the world’s largest privately-owned company. While Cargill’s focus is agricultural commodities – grains, oilseeds, meat, and food ingredients – it competes with Glencore in the agriculture trading and processing arena. Glencore for years had a significant agri-trading arm (formerly Glencore Agriculture, later named Viterra), and although Glencore has recently divested it, the legacy means Glencore knows the grain business well. Cargill, along with rivals like ADM, Bunge, and (formerly) Viterra, is one of the “ABCD” quartet that dominate global grain trade. It sources corn, soybeans, wheat, and more from farmers and ships them worldwide, much as Glencore did with its agri unit.
Cargill’s scale is enormous: in its fiscal year 2023, Cargill posted record revenues of $177 billion, the highest in its 158-year history. This came on the heels of a prior record $165 billion in 2022. Driving those numbers were strong demand for food, feed, and biofuels, and the same global disruptions (like the Ukraine war) that allowed Glencore’s traders to profit also boosted Cargill’s trading margins. For instance, war curtailed Ukraine’s grain exports, raising demand (and prices) for grains from other sources that Cargill handles. Where Cargill and Glencore overlap is in grain and oilseed trading: both would compete to buy crops in exporting regions (like North America, Brazil, or Europe) and supply importing markets (Middle East, Asia). Cargill’s edge is its vast infrastructure – dozens of export terminals, processing plants (crushing soybeans, milling wheat, etc.), and even meatpacking facilities. Glencore’s Viterra had similar assets but on a smaller scale. Now with Glencore largely exiting ag trading, Cargill’s main peers are ADM, Bunge, and emerging players like COFCO. However, Glencore still holds a stake in the ag trade indirectly via its new shareholding in Bunge (post-Viterra merger), so it remains interested in the sector’s dynamics.
Recent Developments: Cargill underwent a leadership change in 2023, appointing a new CEO (Brian Sikes) to succeed longtime chief Dave MacLennan. The company has been expanding in value-added businesses – for example, it acquired a major poultry producer (Sanderson Farms) in 2022 in a joint deal. It is also investing heavily in sustainability, pledging deforestation-free supply chains for soy and palm oil and reducing its maritime shipping emissions. In 2024, as crop prices moderated, Cargill’s revenue dipped slightly (to ~$160 billion) after two record years, but profits remained robust (Cargill reportedly earned around $5 billion in net income in 2021, though it no longer publicly discloses profit). Cargill’s global reach is immense – it has been investing in Brazil (over $2.3 billion since 2014) including port infrastructure, and it plays a key role in food security for China and others. In fact, Cargill and China’s COFCO often partner or compete in sourcing grains. For Glencore, Cargill exemplifies the kind of giant that its own agri venture was up against. With unmatched breadth from farms to food factories, Cargill remains a dominant force in commodities and a yardstick in any conversation about Glencore’s competitors in the global trading landscape.
8) Archer Daniels Midland (ADM)
Website – https://www.adm.com/
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. (ADM) is another American agribusiness powerhouse, often mentioned in the same breath as Cargill. ADM competes with Glencore’s former agri-unit (Viterra) in grain trading, oilseed crushing, and biofuels. ADM operates a vast network of grain elevators, terminals, and processing plants worldwide. It buys crops like corn, soy, and wheat from farmers, processes them into food ingredients (sweeteners, ethanol, vegetable oil, etc.), and trades the raw and processed products globally. ADM’s and Glencore’s paths have crossed in bidding for grain assets and in supplying major import markets, though ADM’s focus is more on value-added processing along with trading.
In recent times, ADM has thrived amid the same volatile dynamics that benefited Glencore’s traders. In 2022 and 2023, global crop supply disruptions and strong demand led to high processing margins. ADM saw robust earnings, repeatedly beating forecasts. For example, in Q2 2023 ADM’s profit exceeded expectations thanks to a record-large Brazilian soy harvest (which it exported and crushed) and solid global demand. The company even raised its 2023 earnings outlook, citing how merchants like ADM “often thrive when crises such as droughts or wars trigger shortages.” This mirrors Glencore’s own experience of thriving in volatility. ADM’s CEO Juan Luciano noted that a more complex world – with volatile geopolitics and weather – actually increases the value of ADM’s services in managing supply chains. The same can be said of Glencore’s traders. Both firms have been beneficiaries of the increased focus on food security and biofuels (ADM is a top ethanol producer and soy biodiesel exporter).
Recent Developments: ADM has been bolstering its Nutrition segment, expanding into high-margin ingredients (flavors, plant-based proteins) to diversify beyond traditional commodity cycles. It has also confronted challenges: in late 2023, ADM disclosed some accounting errors and had to delay earnings reports, which rattled investors. It cut its 2024 profit outlook slightly amid those issues. Nonetheless, its core businesses remain strong. ADM’s strategic moves include investing in sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) precursors and exploring carbon capture at its ethanol plants to reduce emissions. Additionally, ADM has been part of industry consolidation talks – there were past rumors that Glencore had once approached ADM about a potential deal years ago (never confirmed), and more recently ADM was watching the Bunge-Viterra merger developments. With around $100 billion in annual revenue and operations in 200+ countries, ADM stands as a formidable agritrader. In the competitive landscape, ADM and Glencore’s agri-business (now part of Bunge) have often competed for the same export markets and infrastructure. ADM’s continued strong performance and global reach ensure it remains a top competitor among the commodity trading elite.
9) Bunge
Website – https://www.bunge.com/
Bunge Ltd. is a leading global grain and oilseed merchant, traditionally ranked alongside ADM and Cargill. It has now vaulted into an even larger role thanks to a major merger with Viterra – the very agribusiness arm that was once majority-owned by Glencore. This development makes Bunge a particularly interesting “competitor,” as it is absorbing Glencore’s former ag trading unit. In June 2023, Bunge agreed to merge with Glencore-backed Viterra in a $34 billion deal (including debt), creating an agriculture trading giant. Post-merger, the combined company moves closer in scale to the two leaders, ADM and Cargill. Bunge and Viterra together handle massive flows of soy, corn, wheat, and canola across the Americas, Europe, and Asia.
From Glencore’s perspective, this merger is a bit of a strategic retreat – Glencore chose to sell its Viterra stake as part of the deal and will end up with about a 15% shareholding in Bunge. The deal signals how competitive the agribusiness field is: Bunge sought greater scale to compete with ADM/Cargill, and Glencore opted to cash out after a decade in ag trading. For Bunge, the merger yields clear competitive benefits. It gains Viterra’s extensive network in Canada, Australia, and Argentina (Viterra was a top grain handler in those regions), augmenting Bunge’s own strength in Brazil and the U.S. For example, Bunge was Brazil’s largest corn and soy exporter in 2022, and Viterra was also among the top exporters. Combining their operations means more global reach and efficiencies, which will challenge remaining rivals.
Recent Developments: The Bunge–Viterra merger closed in mid-2024 after clearing regulatory hurdles. The integration is underway, and Bunge expects “sustained annual earnings of $4 billion” after synergies, a big jump from pre-merger levels. The deal has made Bunge the second-largest agribusiness trader globally in many aspects, and Glencore’s influence in the sector now comes via its minority stake in the new Bunge. Bunge itself had been performing well – it saw record profits in 2022 amid tight grain supplies, which gave it the balance sheet strength to pursue this mega-deal. The company is also heavily involved in the oilseed processing business (it’s the world’s largest oilseed crusher), and it will need to address regulatory concerns in certain countries due to that concentration. Looking ahead, Bunge is focusing on smooth integration: unifying IT systems, optimizing its expanded network of 180+ grain silos and port terminals, and aligning corporate cultures. In effect, Bunge now is what Glencore’s agriculture arm aspired to be – a globe-spanning agritrader that can go toe-to-toe with ADM and Cargill. As such, while Glencore itself stepped back from direct competition in agri-trading, the sector sees a new formidable competitor in the beefed-up Bunge, which will indirectly benefit Glencore’s shareholders too.
10) Mercuria
Website – http://mercuria.com/
Mercuria Energy Group is another major Swiss-based commodities trader that rivals Glencore, particularly in energy markets. Founded in 2004, Mercuria has grown into one of the world’s top five independent oil traders. It also has significant trading desks for power, natural gas, and emissions – differentiating it from some peers by its early move into electricity and carbon trading. Mercuria competes with Glencore in trading crude oil and refined fuels, and to a lesser extent in certain metals (it has a smaller metals book). However, Mercuria’s strategy has been evolving: it’s been actively shifting its portfolio toward the energy transition, investing in renewables and cleaner commodities.
During the 2022 commodity boom, Mercuria, like others, saw record earnings. It made a net profit of $2.98 billion in 2022, more than double its 2021 profit. Revenues hit $174 billion in 2022, up from $130 billion prior – a jump driven by the same volatile market forces that enriched Glencore’s trading arm. Notably, Mercuria’s chiefs pride themselves on agility: “Nimble Swiss traders thrive in volatile environments,” a Reuters piece remarked, noting Mercuria’s record haul. This indeed mirrors Glencore’s own volatility-driven windfalls. The company’s oil trading volume is huge, but interestingly, oil’s share in Mercuria’s total traded volumes has fallen to below one-third as it grows in power, gas, and other sectors. This indicates Mercuria’s intentional diversification away from being overly oil-centric – a contrast to Vitol, for instance. For Glencore, which also trades coal, gas, and power in addition to oil, Mercuria’s broader energy scope means they cross paths in more markets.
Recent Developments: Mercuria has taken a notably green pivot among commodity traders. Its CEO pledged that more than 50% of new investments would go toward renewables and transitional energy by 2025. True to that, Mercuria has launched ventures like Silvania, committing $500 million to projects in biodiversity, reforestation, and natural carbon sinks. It also acquired stakes in renewable fuel businesses and is trading environmental products. On the conventional side, Mercuria continues to expand in LNG and has upstream investments (it bought into oil fields and also into some mining assets). In 2023, as extreme volatility ebbed, Mercuria’s profits likely normalized to around $1.5–$2 billion (as per industry reports). The company also attracted outside capital – notably a Chinese state fund took a small stake in Mercuria in 2022, highlighting Asia’s interest in global traders. As a private firm with around 1,000 employees, Mercuria sometimes flies under the radar compared to Glencore. Yet its global reach (active in 50+ countries) and bold strategy toward cleaner energy ensure it remains a dynamic competitor. Whether it’s bidding against Glencore for an LNG cargo or competing in the nascent carbon credits market, Mercuria is often in the same arena, increasingly using green investments as a differentiator among the commodity trading pack.
11) Gunvor
Website – https://gunvorgroup.com/
Gunvor Group is a Geneva-based commodity trader, historically rooted in oil like Vitol and Mercuria. Co-founded by Swedish and Russian partners in the early 2000s, Gunvor rose to prominence trading Russian oil exports. Today, it’s one of the world’s largest independent oil and gas traders, and also deals in minerals and coal. Gunvor and Glencore compete mainly in oil trading – securing crude oil cargoes, selling refined products, and increasingly in liquefied natural gas (LNG). Gunvor’s volumes are a notch below Vitol and Trafigura, but it’s still a significant rival in energy markets that Glencore plays in.
Gunvor’s fortunes have followed the boom-and-bust of volatility. In 2022, Gunvor achieved a record net profit of $2.36 billion, triple its prior year and its highest ever. Like its peers, it thrived on the upheaval of war-driven trade shifts and extreme price swings. Fast-forward to 2023, and that volatility “gradually decreased,” leading Gunvor’s profit to nearly halve to about $1.25 billion. The company noted that 2023 was still its second-best year ever, just behind 2022’s bonanza. The drop was expected as markets normalized – for instance, natural gas prices and European power prices calmed significantly. Yet Gunvor kept busy: it actually grew trading volumes in 2023 (177 million tons of commodities, up from 165 MT in 2022) which partly offset slimmer margins. Where Gunvor and Glencore also find common ground (unfortunately) is in regulatory scrutiny. In 2023, Gunvor agreed to pay a hefty $662 million in fines to U.S. and Swiss authorities to resolve investigations into past bribery and corruption (specifically, paying officials in Ecuador to win oil contracts). Glencore, of course, had its own massive bribery settlements in 2022 for wrongdoing in oil markets. These parallel cases show the compliance challenges commodity traders face – and how many of the big houses, be it Gunvor, Vitol, or Glencore, have had to clean up practices.
Recent Developments: Gunvor is positioning for a future beyond just oil. It has invested in LNG infrastructure (it has a small stake in a U.S. LNG export project) and entered renewable trading. It’s also leveraging its profits to invest in refining and shipping assets, which contributed strongly to 2023 results. The company’s ownership has evolved: co-founder Torbjörn Törnqvist remains at the helm, while the other co-founder (Russian tycoon Gennady Timchenko) exited years ago under sanctions pressure. Gunvor has since diversified its sources of crude away from Russia. Financially, 2024 saw continued normalization – reports indicate Gunvor’s net profit fell again (by ~42% in 2024) to around $0.73 billion, reflecting tougher market conditions. Even so, Gunvor’s equity has swelled north of $6 billion, giving it stability. With a strong presence in Europe and growing in Asia, Gunvor remains a keen competitor in energy trading. When OPEC+ cuts supply or China’s oil demand shifts, Gunvor and Glencore often find themselves vying in the same waters – whether literally for tankers or figuratively for market share.
12) COFCO International
Website – https://www.cofcointernational.com/
COFCO International represents the rise of Chinese players in the global commodities arena. Backed by COFCO (China’s state-owned food conglomerate), COFCO International was built by acquiring major assets like Nidera and Noble Agri in the mid-2010s, instantly propelling it into the top tier of grain and oilseed traders. While smaller than ABCD (ADM, Bunge, Cargill, Dreyfus) individually, COFCO Intl. has become a serious competitor, especially in markets feeding China. Glencore’s former agri business often went head-to-head with COFCO to originate crops in Brazil or sell to Asian buyers, and now firms like COFCO stand as the emerging global competitors not from the West.
COFCO’s competitive edge is its direct line to China’s enormous import demand. It is effectively China’s arm for securing food supplies – soybeans, corn, wheat, and more – from abroad. For instance, COFCO is a major buyer of Brazilian soybeans (China’s biggest source). The company has invested heavily in Brazil: over $2.3 billion since 2014, building up infrastructure including a huge port terminal in Santos that can handle 14 million tonnes of grains a year. By doing so, COFCO competes with the likes of Cargill and Glencore/Viterra in exporting from South America. In fact, COFCO’s presence has intensified competition for crop origination – farmers have more bidders for their harvests, often driving prices higher. Glencore experienced this directly in the past decade as COFCO snapped up assets Glencore might have wanted. The global grain trade has thus become a bit less Western-centric, with COFCO (and to some extent other Asian traders like Olam or Marubeni) providing alternative channels.
Recent Developments: COFCO International has been working to improve efficiency and align with China’s sustainability goals. In 2023, it landed its first cargo of deforestation-free soybeans to China, in partnership with a major farming group – a sign of addressing environmental concerns in the soy supply chain (which is linked to Amazon deforestation). COFCO has also shown interest in digitalization; it’s part of Covantis, an industry blockchain initiative to streamline grain trade execution. Financially, COFCO’s private nature means limited disclosures, but it reportedly turned profitable after initial post-merger losses. The company was even rumored to consider an IPO a couple years back, though nothing materialized yet. Strategically, COFCO is crucial for China’s food security. It has expanded into alternative proteins and feed investments domestically, and globally it continues acquiring stakes in storage and logistics (e.g., building new silos in Brazil, upgrading ports). For Glencore (which now largely exits agri-trading except via its Bunge stake), COFCO represents how the competitive landscape has broadened. No longer are the main competitors just the traditional Western firms – a state-run giant from the East now asserts influence. In sum, COFCO International ensures that any global grain trader, present or former, must account for China’s might in the market. And given China’s voracious commodity appetite, COFCO will undoubtedly be a key player shaping flows, occasionally working with – and other times competing fiercely against – the likes of Bunge (Glencore’s proxy), ADM, and Cargill in feeding the world’s 8 billion people.
Conclusion
In surveying Glencore’s top competitors, we see a cast of companies as diverse as the commodities they trade. From mining titans like BHP, Rio Tinto, Anglo American, and Vale, we saw an industry pivoting to future minerals while grappling with past legacies. From trading houses like Trafigura, Vitol, Mercuria, and Gunvor, we witnessed record profits in boom times and strategic shifts toward a lower-carbon future. And in agribusiness leaders like Cargill, ADM, Bunge, and COFCO, we observed an essential sector consolidating and innovating to feed and fuel the world sustainably. Glencore sits at the intersection of these sectors – and thus faces all these competitors on different battlefronts. The competition drives innovation: each company highlighted is adapting – whether via M&A, technology, or ESG commitments – pushing the others to evolve as well.
For a business-savvy audience, the tales of these companies underscore the dynamic nature of global commodity markets. In an era of energy transition and geopolitical uncertainty, the only constant is change. Glencore and its competitors will continue jostling for advantage, striking new deals or perhaps even partnering when interests align (as seen by Glencore’s stake in the new Bunge). Ultimately, understanding Glencore’s world means understanding these rivals – the miners, traders, energy firms, and agribusinesses that collectively keep the world’s factories running, its lights on, and its populations fed. Their stories of competition and adaptation make for an engaging narrative of global business – one that is still unfolding each day in the markets and mines across the planet.
Also Read: Who are Southern Copper’s Competitors in Mining Industry?
Also Read: Top Rio Tinto Competitors: A Comprehensive Analysis
To read more content like this, subscribe to our newsletter
